 
Mercedes instituted an intensive aerodynamics program for the new SL to pare the Cd down to 0.27 for the V6 version.
Creating new vehicle models is all about 
setting and achieving targets—defined by a combination of costs, 
legislation, environmental pressures, social expectations, and 
(sometimes overly) optimistic designers and ambitious engineers. 
Usually, targets have to be prioritized according to the role of the 
vehicle, and there will be clear delineation of needs to help keep 
everything in focus. Increasingly, as technology offers so much, all 
that is changing.
The new Mercedes-Benz
 SL, which is far more than just a “sports car,” epitomizes the 
challenge of integration and, inevitably, as with any design, some 
compromise—and the effort necessary to get that compromise right. The 
Director of Development for the new SL is Jürgen Weissinger, who faced 
the hugely challenging task of overseeing the integration of the wide 
raft of technologies that would make the car a multifaceted machine on a
 grand scale. These facets include premium luxury with more cabin space,
 combined open top and coupe (via its folding roof which comes in three 
versions), an enhanced safety focus, very high performance capability, 
and with ride/handling balance to meet a broad spectrum of demands 
(there are three suspension variants). The new, faster SL is larger than
 the previous model but far more frugal.
There was one defining engineering 
element of the SL (Super Light) that was fixed absolutely at conception:
 it would have an aluminum intensive (almost 90%) bodyshell. Previously 
described by AEI, this brought a combination of opportunities in 
terms of weight savings. The target was 120 kg (265 lb), which was 
bettered by 20 kg (44 lb) for the V6-engined version, which has a curb 
mass of 1685 kg (3715 lb) despite greater crash safety capability and 
more equipment, with associated improved dynamics, reduced fuel burn, 
and lower emissions. Additional challenges, though, involved its 
production.
“We had experience with the SLS, but 
many of that car’s parts are handmade; for the SL, we had to set up 
automated series production with particular focus on initial and total 
costs,” said Weissinger. Depending on applications, parts are produced 
via chill casting or vacuum die-casting worked into extruded aluminum 
sections or panels of various thicknesses.
“We also have used more magnesium in the
 SL than with previous models, with the upper and lower frames of the 
folding roof and the dividing wall between the passenger compartment and
 the rear of the car using the material. Altogether, magnesium is used 
for about 3% of the bodyshell.” High-strength steel tubing is integrated
 in the A-pillars.
Carbon fiber is obvious by its absence. 
But Weissinger explained: “We have to use the right material in the 
right place and at the right time; maybe in five years we will change 
some parts from aluminum or magnesium to carbon fiber. We can do that. 
We have very large cast aluminum parts, so we do not need a specially 
adapted line if we change material.”
The shape of the bodyshell, both as a 
BIW and fully dressed, was also critical. The previous SL versions had a
 drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.29 to 0.30, but the new car (V6 version) 
achieves a best 0.27 despite being larger, although its extra length 
helped contribute to the figure. “This is not just a best-in-class 
figure, but we believe it is the best of any series production sports 
car,” stated SL aerodynamicist Dr. Teddy Woll. 
Because of increases in tire and body 
sizes to provide levels of comfort, handling, and safety required in 
recent years, sports car Cd figures have crept up. Porsche
 confirms that its 356 coupe (pre-A model) achieved a Cd of 0.296 in 
1952, an early benchmark for series production sports cars. The latest 
911 achieves a slightly better 0.29.
The new SL has received exceptional 
attention to aerodynamic detail, explained Woll. This includes precise 
shaping and grooving of the exterior mirrors to both smooth airflow and 
obviate the risk of rainwater and road dirt obscuring side window 
vision. Also, the rear deck is flat without the raised trailing edge 
typical of many aerodynamic solutions, but it nevertheless provides 
required downforce on the rear axle. Wind noise is very low with the 
hardtop closed, aerodynamics complemented by sealing precision.
Wheels are aerodynamically optimized, 
the underbody is flat, and a diffuser is fitted from the area of the 
rear axle to the back of the car. An active cooling air intake system 
contributes to aerodynamic efficiency via on-demand shuttering.
Woll believes Cd figures will continue 
to reduce, although it is a tough task: “A few years ago, we could never
 have imagined a wagon-type vehicle achieving a Cd of 0.24, but now we 
have it with our B-Class equipped with Eco package.”
Could this go lower without cars looking
 weird? Woll believes that vehicles looking very different from those of
 today might be acceptable if there was a major energy crisis with the 
associated need to make huge transport efficiency gains: “Then maybe we 
would have to have drag goals of 0.20 Cd or lower. But that is crystal 
ball gazing—and remember that a perfectly streamlined fish or bird’s Cd 
is around 0.05, but add wheels and that becomes 0.15!”
“Some compromise is a necessity for any 
vehicle, even the SL," Weissinger underlined. "We set drag targets to 
help achieve top speed and CO2, discuss overall development 
with engineering colleagues, and then go for those targets with the 
stylists; but compromise is a permanent game, a day-to-day process.”
Despite those inevitable compromises, 
fuel consumption for the 4.7-L V8 500SL has been improved by some 22% to
 9.1 L/100 km in the combined cycle, power is up 12% to 320 kW (429 hp),
 and torque is up 32% to 700 N·m (516 lb·ft) from 1800 to 3500 rpm, 
while engine displacement is reduced by 0.8 L. 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) 
acceleration comes in at 4.6 s. The 3.5-L 225-kW (302-hp) V6 is 30% more
 economical than the previous model.
At 4612 mm (181.6 in), the new SL is 50 mm (2.0 in) longer, and it is 57 mm (2.2 in) wider at 1877 mm (73.9 in).
Magic Sky Control (previously described by AEI)
 is an option for the folding hardtop, which takes 20 s to open or 
close. Although the word “magic” in this context may not conjure up an 
impression of traditional Mercedes’ design engineering and quality, the 
company is sticking with it and has now introduced Magic Vision Control 
for the SL. The system involves windshield washer fluid activated from 
minute channels (160 in total) in the wiper blade lip to avoid vision 
distorting water being pumped onto the glass. Operated with the roof 
lowered, the fluid does not enter the cabin. Heated wiper blades are an 
option.
Another interesting detail is the use of
 hands-free contactless opening and closing of the trunk lid. Sensors 
recognize a foot extended below the bumper. Ford will offer a similar 
solution for the new Kuga.
Free areas in the body structure in the 
front footwells are used as resonance spaces for the in-car 
entertainment’s bass loudspeakers.
An SL 65 AMG V12 twin-turbo developing 
463 kW (621 hp) and maximum torque of 1000 N·m (738 lb·ft) will be 
launched in September. It is 170 kg (375 lb) lighter than the previous 
model. Performance figures include 0-200 km/h (0-124 mph) in 11.8 s.
Torsional rigidity of the SL is 19,700 
N·m per degree, another target achieved but one likely to be raised 
still further on later generations of the car, believes Weissinger: “It 
is a question of weight, structure, and space—so it is that inevitable 
compromise again. Our task is to get the balance of compromises exactly 
right.” 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment